Rather than sully our on-site OOC thread with the often-childish and unprofessional bickering that has occasionally appeared there, let's use this thread as a safe place to work out our differences.
To come will be a more rigid and official set of rules and procedures. Fortunately, we have made it this far without really needing them and have been able to keep a nice, casual atmosphere; unfortunately, the time has come that we need them.
Of course, the first order of business is the nasty affair with Inesea and Pavlovstani's memberships being up for review. Once the official list of charges is compiled and ratified, it will be posted here. Please be patient while it is drafted; casual and unofficial discussion, as you've already seen, has backfired badly.
What do you mean? Right now, there are few enough threads on this forum that it won't get lost; if we need to sticky it at sometime, I'll figure out how to do it then, but there's not much point right now. Besides, it's linked to in the "Dispute Resolution" page off the homepage.
Actually, this really should probably be in the "Board Room" section instead. I'll see if I can figure out how to move it.
It doesn't seem to have much of a point anymore. Stalling the trial or whatever only makes the situation less serious as time passes. Wirbel has posted on the OOC several times on unrelated things and it appears as if everything has gone back to normal. Perhaps the group won't be lenient the next time, but we should take strides to make sure that they don't screw up or mess with anything if that's what people seem to be worried about.
Also, guess who I am!
Cyprum, I can see your IP. And it's going to remain here for the next time we need it (and hopefully we won't).
Wirbel has posted about unrelated stuff because he has decided to leave Inesea with a stern (and final) warning and it's time to move on. Next time, he's gone. But, like I said, it hopefully won't come to that.
So, the purpose of this thread is general conflict resolution, or specifically for the trial? If the former, then it ought to stay, but if the latter, then why keep it?
In which case, I retract my request to archive this thread... and propose that we begin discussing Antietam's claim.